KESEJAHTERAAN TENAGA PENDIDIK DAN KEPENDIDIKAN DI SDN BERTINGKAT NAIKOTEN KOTA KUPANG
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the welfare of educators and educational staff, specifically how welfare, including appreciation, clear promotion paths, and supportive working conditions, impacts teacher motivation and performance. The research method uses in-depth interviews to obtain rich and contextual qualitative data from teachers and educational staff. The findings reveal that teachers who feel financially and psychologically well-being show high levels of motivation and professionalism, which in turn contribute significantly to the quality of learning. The appreciation given is not only in the form of economic compensation but also includes social and professional recognition as well as transparent and fair career paths that encourage teachers to continue developing their abilities. A conducive work environment and continuous training also play an important role in improving teachers' welfare and loyalty to educational institutions. The overall results of the study confirm that teacher welfare is a key factor in creating an effective and sustainable education system. This study recommends improving policies that prioritize teacher welfare in order to improve the quality of national education. These results are supported by experts such as Hutasuhut (2025), Sari (2020), and Moleong (2018), who highlight the importance of synergy between compensation, appreciation, and development.
References
Profesional GuruUntuk Meningkatkan Kinerja
Mengajar. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Arikunto, S. (2006). Proses Penelitian: Suatu PendekatanPratik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Asrin, A. (2021). Evaluasi Kebijakan Pendidikan Nasional dalam Peningkatan Mutu Guru. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Budi, R. (2011). Improving mathematics communication ability of students in grade 2 through PMRI approach. Dalam A mahmudi (Ed.), Prosiding Internasional Seminar and The Fourth Natinal Confererence on Mathematics Education 2011: Vol. 4, Pebelajaran Matematika dan Aplikasinya (hlm. 547- 556). Yogyakarta: Uneversitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2006). Permendiknas Nomor
22 Tahun 2006 tentang Standar Isi Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2006). Permendiknas Nomor
23 Tahun 2006. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Hutasuhut, M. (2025). Kesejahteraaan guru dan Motivasi Kerja dalam
Peningkatan Mutu
pembelajaran. Medan: Universitas negeri Medan Press.
Mansir, A. (2020). Kesejahteraan Guru dan Tantangan Profesionalisme Pendidikan. Makassar: Alauddin University Press.
Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Muliadi, & Nasri, Y. (2023). Tantangan Kebijakan Pendidikan Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Safri, A., Nuraini, R., & Putra, H. (2022). Kualitas Guru dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Mutu Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana.
Sari, N. (2020). Apresiasi Profesi Guru dan Implikasinya terhadap Motivasi Kerja. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Siswono, T. Y. E. (2007).
Penjenjangan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif dan Identifikasi Tahap Berpikir Kreatif Peserta didik dalam Memecahkan dan Mengajukan Masalah
Matematika (Disertasi).
Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Stacey, K. (2010). The view of mathematical literacy in Indonesia. Journal on Mathematics Education (IndoMS-JME), 2(2), 1–24.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Syahputra, R. (2025). Kesejahteraan Ekonomi Guru dan Dampaknya terhadap Motivasi Mengajar. Aceh: Syiah Kuala University Press.
Syaadah, Y., Ramadhani, M., & Yusuf, A. (2023). Peran Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan dalam Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Prenadamedia.
Thompson, T. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ interpretation of higher-order thinking in Bloom’s taxonomy. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(2), 96–109.
