REKONSTRUKSI EPISTEMOLOGI PENDIDIKAN ISLAM : ANALISIS KOMPARATIF KEBIJAKAN DAN KURIKULUM DI INDONESIA, MALAYSIA DAN TURKI

  • Dede Misbahul Alam Universitas Islam 45 Bekasi
  • Dindin Universitas Islam 45 Bekasi
  • Syarif Hidayatullah Universitas Islam 45 Bekasi
Keywords: Islamic Education, Comparative Study, Curriculum Policy, Indonesia, Malaysia, Turkey.

Abstract

Islamic education in the contemporary era faces the challenge of dualism between revelation-based education and science-based education. This research aims to comparatively dissect the models of Islamic education in three countries with distinct socio-political characteristics: Indonesia, Malaysia, and Turkey. The primary issue addressed is how curriculum integration is implemented and to what extent state authority influences the independence of Islamic educational institutions. The research method employed is qualitative with a descriptive comparative study approach through library research data collection techniques. The findings indicate that Indonesia implements a pluralistic-decentralized model through the dichotomy of Madrasahs and Integrated Islamic Schools; Malaysia applies an integrative-centralized model that rigidly incorporates religious education into the national curriculum; while Turkey utilizes a functionalist model through Imam Hatip Schools that bridge Islamic values within a secular state framework. The conclusion of this study asserts that the success of Islamic education in various countries is determined not only by curricular content but also by the system's ability to adapt to political policies and global labor market demands.

References

Altunoglu, M., & Celik, Z. (2020). The Rise of Imam Hatip Schools: The Role of Religion in Turkish Education. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 47(4), 543-560. https://doi.org/10.1080/13530194.2018.1500142

Azra, A. (2018). Islamic Education in Indonesia: Between Modernization and Democratic Transition. Dalam Robert W. Hefner (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Indonesia (hlm. 321-334). Routledge.

Bereday, G. Z. F. (1964). Comparative Method in Education. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. (Referensi klasik untuk metodologi komparasi).

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Hefner, R. W. (2019). Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Islam and Muslim Politics. Routledge.

Musa, N., Mohamad, S., & Ahmad, N. A. (2021). Integrating Islamic Values in the Malaysian National Curriculum: Challenges and Prospects. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(6), 1120-1135. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i6/10231

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results: Factsheets for Indonesia, Malaysia, and Turkey. OECD Publishing.

Pohl, F. (2020). Islamic Schools and the State in Indonesia and Malaysia. Dalam International Handbook of Islamic Education (hlm. 1-18). Springer Nature.

Sani, M. A. M. (2016). The Development of Islamic Education in Malaysia. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS).

Tan, C. (2020). Islamic Education and Critical Thinking: Comparative Perspectives. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 54(6), 1545-1560. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12499

Published
2026-01-23
How to Cite
Dede Misbahul Alam, Dindin, & Syarif Hidayatullah. (2026). REKONSTRUKSI EPISTEMOLOGI PENDIDIKAN ISLAM : ANALISIS KOMPARATIF KEBIJAKAN DAN KURIKULUM DI INDONESIA, MALAYSIA DAN TURKI. Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 12(01), 59 - 70. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v12i01.11354