ANALISI BREAK EVEN POINT (BEP) UNTUK MELIHAT STRATEGI KEBERLANJUTAN USAHA MEBEL KAYU DI KABUPATEN TAKALAR PERIODE 2021-2025 (STUDI KASUS : UD.ISRA MEUBLE)

  • Ika Nurinsana Zahra Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
  • Muchriana Muchran Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
  • Amelia Rezki Septiani Amin Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
Keywords: Break Even Point, business sustainability, cost analysis, wooden furniture

Abstract

This study analyzes the Break Even Point (BEP) to assess the sustainability strategy of a wooden furniture business at UD. Isra Meuble in Takalar Regency for the period 2021–2025. Using a quantitative descriptive approach based on financial report data including fixed costs, variable costs, and sales over five years, the results indicate that fixed costs increased from Rp379,000,000 in 2021 to Rp486,000,000 in 2025, while variable costs fluctuated from Rp475,400,000 to Rp621,100,000. Despite rising costs, actual sales consistently exceeded the break-even point each year. In 2021, sales of Rp813,000,000 surpassed the BEP of Rp673,354,458, producing a margin of safety of 17.18%. The best performance was recorded in 2023 with a margin of safety of 46.08% and net profit of Rp295,230,000. The most critical period was 2024 with a margin of safety of only 8.42% due to a 56.25% increase in fixed labor costs. By 2025, the business recovered with a margin of safety of 26.91%. BEP analysis provides a basis for setting sales targets, controlling costs, and formulating sustainability strategies through material efficiency, energy optimization, waste utilization, workforce development, and digital green marketing via SIPLah

References

Defa, A. S., Febrianisa, A. E., Maharani, T. P., Listiani, T., & Susanto, R. (2021). Analisis Break Even Point (BEP) Usaha Jati Furniture di Desa Sambirembe Kecamatan Kalijambe Kabupaten Sragen. Seminar Nasional Hukum, Bisnis, Sains Dan Teknologi, 2(2), 18–27.
Fauzi, A., Rukmayani, E., Estevani, G., Gumelarasati, N., & Fahrezi, M. K. (2024). Analisis Break Even Point (BEP) Sebagai Alat Perencanaan Laba. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Ekonomi, 2(1), 83–102.
Garrison, R. H., Noreen, E. W., & Brewer, P. C. (2018). Managerial Accounting (16th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Handayani, F. (2025). Analisa Peluang dan Tantangan Produk Furniture Kayu Indonesia dalam Perdagangan Internasional. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 3(1), 429–433.
Kemenperin. (2024). Kemenperin Dorong Industri Furnitur sebagai Sektor Pendukung Potensi Pariwisata. https://ikm.kemenperin.go.id
Muhammad Suandi, M. E., Amlus, M. H., Hemdi, A. R., Abd Rahim, S. Z., Ghazali, M. F., & Rahim, N. L. (2022). A Review on Sustainability Characteristics Development for Wooden Furniture Design. Sustainability, 14(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148748
Prameswari, Y. P., & Ardianto, H. T. (2023). Kuasa Pengetahuan dalam Rantai Nilai Industri Mebel di Jepara. Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 14(1), 123–140.
Priskila Manuho, Zevania Makalare, Trixie Mamangkey, & Novi Swandari Budiarso. (2021). Analisis Break Even Point (BEP). Jurnal Ipteks Akuntansi Bagi Masyarakat, 5(1), 21–28.
Rahmah, N., Kaskoyo, H., Saputro, S. G., & Hidayat, W. (2020). Analisis Biaya Produksi Furnitur: Studi Kasus di Mebel Barokah 3, Desa Marga Agung, Lampung Selatan. Jurnal Sylva Lestari, 8(2), 207–217.
Romadlon, C. G., & Sujud, F. A. (2024). Analisis Break Even Point dalam Penentuan Proyeksi Laba pada Usaha Toko Kelontong D'Bantar Bamboo Craft. Jurnal Tanbih, 1(2), 1–22.
Windariana, R. (2023). Sustainable Business - Pengertian, Tujuan, Manfaat, Prinsip, dan Contohnya. https://ukmindonesia.id
Yulinda, Hasanah, U., & Utami, D. P. (2022). Analisis Break Even Point Sebagai Alat Perencanaan Laba (Studi Kasus: P-IRT Tempe Syafira Kecamatan Bagelen). Surya Agritama, 11(2), 159–173.
Published
2026-04-14
How to Cite
Nurinsana Zahra, I., Muchran, M., & Rezki Septiani Amin, A. (2026). ANALISI BREAK EVEN POINT (BEP) UNTUK MELIHAT STRATEGI KEBERLANJUTAN USAHA MEBEL KAYU DI KABUPATEN TAKALAR PERIODE 2021-2025 (STUDI KASUS : UD.ISRA MEUBLE). Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 12(02), 197 - 204. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v12i02.12452