STRATEGI MEMAJUKAN PENDIDIKAN MADRASAH MELALUI KEPEMIMPINAN BERBASIS TEKNOLOGI
Abstract
This study aims to analyze strategies for advancing madrasah education through technology-based leadership in the digital era. The background of this research is based on the demands of educational transformation due to the rapid development of information and communication technology, which requires madrasahs to adapt and innovate in both learning processes and educational management. This study employs a qualitative approach using literature review and conceptual analysis of various theories and practices of technology implementation in education. The findings reveal that strategies to advance madrasah education through technology-based leadership are carried out through several key steps: (1) integrating technology into learning in a planned and relevant manner; (2) improving digital competencies of teachers and students; (3) developing technology-based learning innovations such as gamification and Problem-Based Learning; (4) implementing visionary, adaptive, and innovative leadership; and (5) developing systematic digital strategies through stages of analysis, implementation, and continuous evaluation. In conclusion, technology-based leadership plays a crucial role in driving digital transformation in madrasahs. Strategic and sustainable integration of technology can enhance the quality of learning, improve the effectiveness of educational management, and produce graduates who are competent and ready to face the challenges of the digital era.
Keywords: technology-based leadership, madrasah education, digital transformation, learning innovation, educational strategy
References
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Bloom, B. S. (2021). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Pearson.
Azra, A. (2019). Pendidikan Islam: Tradisi dan modernisasi di tengah tantangan milenium III. Kencana.
Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–24.
Bowen, G. A. (2019). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 19(1), 27–40.
Bush, T. (2020). Educational leadership and management: Theory, policy, and practice. Sage Publications.
Chanias, S., Myers, M. D., & Hess, T. (2019). Digital transformation strategy making in pre-digital organizations: The case of a financial services provider. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(1), 17–33.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2019). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2019). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2020). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer.
Dong, C., Cao, S., & Li, H. (2020). Young children’s online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: Chinese parents’ beliefs and attitudes. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 105440.
European Commission. (2020). Digital Education Action Plan 2021–2027: Resetting education and training for the digital age.
Flick, U. (2020). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Fullan, M. (2020). Leading in a culture of change. Jossey-Bass.
Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, J. (2020). Deep learning: Engage the world change the world. Corwin Press.
Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2021). What works and why? Student perceptions of useful digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 46(8), 1537–1552.
Johnston, M. P. (2020). Secondary data analysis: A method of which the time has come. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 9(3), 619–626.
Kementerian Agama RI. (2020). Kebijakan pengembangan pendidikan madrasah di Indonesia. Kemenag RI.
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2019). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19.
Laurillard, D. (2021). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge.
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2020). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
OECD. (2021). Education at a glance 2021: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing.
Redecker, C. (2020). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. European Commission.
Schein, E. H. (2021). Organizational culture and leadership (5th ed.). Wiley.
Schwab, K. (2019). The fourth industrial revolution. Crown Business.
Selwyn, N. (2019). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
Siswadi, H. (2021). Kepemimpinan pendidikan modern. Selat Media.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.
UNESCO. (2020). Education in a post-COVID world: Nine ideas for public action. UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO.
Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144.
Wang, A. I., & Tahir, R. (2020). The effect of using Kahoot! for learning: A literature review. Computers & Education, 149, 103818.
World Bank. (2020). Remote learning and COVID-19: The use of educational technologies at scale across an education system. World Bank Group.
Zainuddin, Z., Habiburrahim, H., Muluk, S., & Keumala, C. M. (2020). How do students become self-directed learners in the E-learning environment? Interactive Learning Environments, 28(6), 1–14.
