KENDALA BELAJAR MAHASISWA DALAM PENERAPAN PENDEKATAN OPTIC-SCRAP DALAM MATA KULIAH GEOLOGI

  • Khalila Isnaini Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Bigharta Bekti Susetyo Universitas Negeri Padang
Keywords: Learning Barriers, OPTIC-SCRAP, Geology Learning, Spatial Literacy

Abstract

The OPTIC-SCRAP approach is used to facilitate systematic visual analysis, but learning challenges remain. This study aims to identify how the OPTIC-SCRAP approach is implemented in Geology courses and the learning challenges faced by students using the OPTIC-SCRAP approach.

This study employed a quantitative approach with descriptive methods. Purposive sampling was used based on the results of a preliminary spatial literacy test, resulting in 29 undergraduate students from the class of 2025 being selected as the study sample. Data were collected using a Likert-scale questionnaire that underwent validity and reliability testing. Data were then analyzed using descriptive statistics. The test results showed that out of 49 items, 38 were valid, and a Cronbach's Alpha value of 0.941 was obtained.

The results indicate that the application of the OPTIC-SCRAP approach over four sessions gradually improved students' abilities, from descriptive to evaluative, and strengthened critical thinking, spatial analysis, and self-confidence, making it effective in problem-solving-based geology learning. Based on the application of OPTIC-SCRAP, learning obstacles are dominated by internal factors with a fairly high category with a score of 60.2 while external factors have a score of 40. If viewed from gender, in terms of internal factors, women have a score of 61.14 with a fairly high category while men have a score of 51.5 with a low category. In terms of external factors, women have a score of 40.90 with a fairly high category while men have a score of 34 with a low category. Based on academic background, social studies students have a fairly high category of learning obstacles in the internal factor with a score of 61.81 and external factors with a score of 41.44, while science students are in the low category with a score of 51 on internal factors and 35 on external factors. Overall, this study confirms that the OPTIC-SCRAP approach is effective in improving the quality of geology learning, but still requires optimization, especially in overcoming learning obstacles originating from students' internal factors so that learning outcomes can be achieved more optimally and evenly.

References

Agustina, D., & Sari, R. Y. (2021). Literasi spasial mahasiswa pendidikan geografi dalam menginterpretasi citra penginderaan jauh.

Ahmad Purwanto. (2024). Higher order thinking skills: Concept and implementation in learning. TA’DIB: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 2(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.69768/jt.v2i1.44

Aksa, F. I. (2019). Geografi dalam perspektif filsafat ilmu. Majalah Geografi Indonesia, 33(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.22146/mgi.35682

Alhadi, S., Saputra, W. N. E., Supriyanto, A., & Ediyanto, E. (2018). Self-regulated learning: Is it different between men and women students?

Andini, T. M., & Prastiyowati, S. (2021). Gender differences learning strategy at English language education department students. JINoP (Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran), 7(2), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.22219/jinop.v7i2.10476

Apriyani, S. D., & Meitasari, I. (2023). Kesulitan belajar siswa pada pembelajaran geografi. Jurnal Educatio, 9(4), 2192–2199. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v9i4.6421

Azevedo, A. R., et al. (2025). Project-based learning and the challenges of the 21st century. In Science and connections: The interdependence of disciplines. https://doi.org/10.56238/sevened2024.037-146

Bednarz, S. W., & Kemp, K. (2011). Understanding and nurturing spatial literacy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 21, 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.07.004

Daud, K. A. M., et al. (2018). Validity and reliability of instrument to measure social media skills.

Eka Putri, A., & Nofrion, N. (2024). Analisis kesulitan belajar geografi siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 8(1), 11724–11730. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v8i1.14151

Esteban-Guitart, M., & Gee, J. (2024). Learning as life project(s). Learning: Research and Practice, 10(1), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2023.2291010

Faizah, H., & Kamal, R. (2024). Belajar dan pembelajaran. Jurnal Basicedu, 8(1), 466–476. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v8i1.6735

Fithriyah, D. N. (2024). Teori-teori belajar dan aplikasinya. JEMI, 2(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.61815/jemi.v2i1.341

Jo, I., Crane, M., Hong, J. E., & Huh, S. (2022). Geoactivity types in APHG. The Geography Teacher, 19(2), 56–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/19338341.2022.2042837

Karlina, L., Arisanty, D., & Adyatma, S. (2021). Faktor kesulitan belajar geografi. PAKIS, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.20527/pakis.v1i2.4005

Kilic, S. (2016). Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient. Journal of Mood Disorders, 6(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.5455/jmood.20160307122823

King, H. (2012). Student difficulties in learning geoscience. Planet, 25(1), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.11120/plan.2012.00250040

Mailin, M. (2021). Kebijakan MBKM di perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Analisa Pemikiran Insaan Cendikia, 4(1), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.54583/apic.vol4.no1.59

Manakane, S. E., Latue, P. C., & Rakuasa, H. (2023). Integrating geospatial technology in learning. Sinergi International Journal of Education, 1(2), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.61194/education.v1i2.70

Metzger, E. P. (2024). Reimagining geoscience education for sustainability. Earth Science, Systems and Society, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.3389/esss.2024.10116

Muñiz Solari, O., Solem, M., & Boehm, R. (2017). Learning progressions in geography education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44717-9

Nandi Kurniawan. (2022). Kemampuan berpikir spasial mahasiswa. Edukasi IPS, 6(2), 39–46.

Qoyyimun Nafal, Sokip, & Asrop Syafi’i. (2024). Strategi peningkatan mutu perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Budi Pekerti Agama Islam, 2(5), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.61132/jbpai.v2i5.497

Rakuasa, H., & Latue, P. C. (2023). Geography education and environmental awareness. Journal of Education Method and Learning Strategy, 2(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.59653/jemls.v2i01.293

Ritzer, G. (1975). Sociology: A multiple paradigm science.

Rushton, J. P., & Ankney, C. D. (2009). Brain size and mental ability. International Journal of Neuroscience, 119(5), 692–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207450802325843

Sejati, S. P. (2021). Teknologi geospasial sebagai media pembelajaran. Geomedia, 19(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.21831/gm.v19i1.37713

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Alfabeta.

Published
2026-04-25
How to Cite
Isnaini, K., & Bigharta Bekti Susetyo. (2026). KENDALA BELAJAR MAHASISWA DALAM PENERAPAN PENDEKATAN OPTIC-SCRAP DALAM MATA KULIAH GEOLOGI. Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 12(02), 170 - 184. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v12i02.12940