PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN SAVI (SOMATIS, AUDITORI, VISUAL, DAN INTELEKTUAL) TERHADAP PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN LITERASI NUMERASI SISWA DI SEKOLAH MENENGAH ATAS
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate whether or not the Somatic, Auditory, Visual, and Intellectual (SAVI) learning paradigm has an effect on the numeracy literacy of SMA Negeri 1 Sedayu's twelfth graders. Poor student numeracy abilities and the prevalence of traditional teaching techniques prompted the investigation. The non-equivalent control group design was used in this quantitative study as part of the quasi-experimental technique. We used SPSS's Independent Sample T-Test and N-Gain Score test to examine the data that our testing tools had produced. A Sig.(2-tailed) value of 0.005 < 0.05 was used to indicate a significant difference in improvement between the two groups in the findings. With an average N-Gain score of 0.52, the experimental group was considered to have "Medium" efficacy. These results demonstrate that the SAVI model outperforms traditional approaches because it uses multimodal activities to help students develop strong conceptual knowledge, boost their willingness to study, and solve contextual numeracy difficulties.
References
Artikel:
Arikunto, S. (2021). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi 3. Bumi Aksara.
Aulia, R. D., & Mastoah, I. (2025). Penerapan Media Pop-Up Book Dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Pada Materi Bangun Datar Di Kelas Iii Sd. 9.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research Methods In Education (8th Ed.). Routledge. Https://Doi.Org/10.4324/9781315456539
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, And Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How To Design And Evaluate Research In Education (8th Ed). Mcgraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages.
Kemendikbudristek. (2025). Panduan Pembelajaran Dan Asesmen Pada Kurikulum Merdeka (Revisi Ke-3). Badan Standar, Kurikulum, Dan Asesmen Pendidikan (Bskap).
Khasanah, F., & Octavianti, C. T. (2017). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berfikir Kritis Mahasiswa Melalui Pembelajaran Savi Dengan Mengoptimalkan Math Expert. Union: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 143–152. Https://Doi.Org/10.30738/.V5i2.1219
Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, And Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. The Guilford Press.
Lidiani, S. A., & Indarini, E. (2023). Penerapan Model 3 Cm Learning Berbantuan Media Konkret Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Dan Hasil Belajar Matematika. Pionir: Jurnal Pendidikan, 12(3). Https://Doi.Org/10.22373/Pjp.V12i3.21368
Mahmud, M. R., & Pratiwi, I. M. (2019). Literasi Numerasi Siswa Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Tidak Terstruktur. Kalamatika Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 69–88. Https://Doi.Org/10.22236/Kalamatika.Vol4no1.2019pp69-88
Mukmin, Subakti, H., Zainuri, H., & Yusuf, B. (2024). Inovasi Pembelajaran Di Abad 21. Yayasan Kita Menulis.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., & Fishbein, B. (2020). TIMSS 2019 International Results In Mathematics And Science. International Association For The Evaluation Of Educational Achievement. Https://Eric.Ed.Gov/?Id=Ed596167
Nurhaswinda, N., & Parisu, C. Z. L. (2025). Kesulitan Belajar Matematika Di Sekolah Dasar Dan Solusinya. Jurnal Pendidikan Multidisiplin, 1(1), 50–58. Https://Doi.Org/10.54297/Jpmd.V1i1.884
Oecd. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know And Can Do. Oecd Publishing. Https://Doi.Org/10.1787/5f07c754-En
Purpura, D. J., King, Y. A., Rolan, E., Hornburg, C. B., Schmitt, S. A., Hart, S. A., & Ganley, C. M. (2020). Examining The Factor Structure Of The Home Mathematics Environment To Delineate Its Role In Predicting Preschool Numeracy, Mathematical Language, And Spatial Skills. Frontiers In Psychology, 11, 1925. Https://Doi.Org/10.3389/Fpsyg.2020.01925
Rahman, M. S. (2025). Peran Media Pembelajaran Dan Kecemasan Dalam Mengembangkan Kecakapan Matematis Siswa. Judika (Jurnal Pendidikan Unsika), 13(1), 25–42. Https://Doi.Org/10.35706/Judika.V13i1.3630
Rusman, D. (2017). Belajar & Pembelajaran: Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Prenada Media.
Saraswati, P. D., Kertih, I. W., & Suastika, I. N. (2023). Pengaruh Model Quantum Teaching Terhadap Efikasi Diri Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Ips. Media Komunikasi Fpips, 22(1), 37–45. Https://Doi.Org/10.23887/Mkfis.V22i1.50983
Schunk, D. H. (2020). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective (Eighth Edition). Pearson.
Slavin, R. E. (2020). Educational Psychology: Theory And Practice. 560.
Sugiyono, S. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. Cv. Alfabeta.
Tohir, M. (2019). Hasil PISA Indonesia Tahun 2018 Turun Dibanding Tahun 2015. Https://Doi.Org/10.17605/Osf.Io/8q9vy
Triyani, S. (2025). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Siswa Melalui Soal Model PISA Berbasis Konteks Keislaman Di Sekolah Dasar Muhammadiyah 15 Surakarta. 15(1).
Ulandari, L., Amry, Z., & Saragih, S. (2019). Development Of Learning Materials Based On Realistic Mathematics Education Approach To Improve Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Ability And Self-Efficacy. International Electronic Journal Of Mathematics Education, 14(2). Https://Doi.Org/10.29333/Iejme/5721
