KONSTRUKTIVISME SOSIAL DALAM PEMANFAATAN CANVA SEBAGAI MEDIA PEMBELAJARAN AGRIBISNIS: STUDI KASUS DI SMK NEGERI 6 TAKALAR
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the psychological phenomena of vocational students' learning through the lens of Vygotsky's Social Constructivism theory in the context of using Canva as an Agribusiness learning medium. A descriptive qualitative method with a case study approach was employed through two direct classroom observation sessions in Grade X Agribusiness. Results reveal a gap between Canva's interactive potential and its one-way implementation, indicating that the principles of Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD), scaffolding, and social mediation remain underutilized. These findings suggest that passive technology use inhibits active knowledge construction. This article recommends transforming Canva from a presentation medium into a collaborative constructive platform through think-pair-share strategies, visual artifact peer review, and advance organizers grounded in local agribusiness contexts.
References
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.
Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261-292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
Jonassen, D. H. (2020). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models (pp. 215-239). Routledge.
Kirschner, P. A., & De Bruyckere, P. (2017). The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 135-142.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2020). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning. Educational Psychologist, 52(2), 99-114.
Dolan, J. E. (2021). Splicing the divide: A review of research on the evolving digital divide among K-12 students. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 53(1), 63-78.
Ferdig, R. E., & Pytash, K. E. (2022). Enduring principles for technology integration in literacy classrooms. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 23(1), 1-20.
Plass, J. L., Moreno, R., & Brunken, R. (2021). Cognitive load theory. Cambridge University Press.
Merrill, M. D. (2022). First principles of instruction: Identifying and designing effective, efficient, and engaging instruction. Wiley.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2020). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press.
Yilmaz, K. (2021). The cognitive perspective on learning: Its theoretical underpinnings and implications for classroom practices. The Clearing House, 84(5), 204-212.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Canva for Education. (2023). Collaborative design tools for K-12 and higher education. https://www.canva.com/education/
Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26(2), 43-71.
Jonassen, D. H., Howland, J., Marra, R., & Crismond, D. (2022). Meaningful learning with technology (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
