Language Variation Used by Food Vloggers on TikTok and Its Influence on Audience Language Use

  • Mutia Putri Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Sholihatul Hamidah Daulay Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Keywords: Language variation, Code switching, tiktok

Abstract

This study investigates language variation employed by food vloggers on TikTok and examines its subsequent influence on how audiences communicate in digital spaces. As short-form video content continues to reshape sociolinguistic norms among Indonesian youth, food vloggers have emerged as influential language agents who blend Bahasa Indonesia with English, deploy culinary-specific slang, and adopt trending expressions that resonate with younger audiences. Drawing on a qualitative descriptive approach, this research collected data from TikTok food vlogs, including video transcripts, captions, comments, and hashtags, from five prominent Indonesian food vlogger accounts throughout 2023 to 2024. The analysis was guided by sociolinguistic frameworks proposed by Labov (1972), Hymes (1974), Fishman (1972), and Trudgill (2000). Findings reveal four dominant patterns of language variation: code switching between Bahasa Indonesia and English, code mixing within single utterances, the use of culinary slang, and the appropriation of prestige language to construct social identity. Expressions such as "worth it," "creamy banget," "hidden gem," and "healing sambil ngopi" are not merely descriptive but serve as markers of modern, globally-oriented identity. Audience analysis further shows that followers increasingly replicate these linguistic patterns in their comment sections, suggesting a significant bidirectional influence between content creators and viewers. This study contributes to growing scholarly interest in digital sociolinguistics, youth language, and the role of social media influencers in shaping communicative norms.

References

Al-Qaysi, N., Mohamad-Nordin, N., & Al-Emran, M. (2021). A systematic review of social media acceptance from the perspective of educational and information systems theories. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 2779–2831.
Androutsopoulos, J. (2020). Digital language change: Sociolinguistic processes and linguistic patterns. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 24(5), 578–590.
Barton, D., & Lee, C. (2013). Language online: Investigating digital texts and practices. Routledge.
Baym, N. K. (2015). Personal connections in the digital age (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Crystal, D. (2011). Language and the internet (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Daulay, S. H. (2019). Language and Society. Medan: Lembaga Peduli Pengembangan Pendidikan Indonesia (LPPPI).
Dewi, R., & Kurniawan, E. (2022). Multimodal discourse analysis of Indonesian food review content on YouTube. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(2), 1011–1025.
Fishman, J. A. (1972). The sociology of language: An interdisciplinary social science approach to language in society. Newbury House.
Floris, F. D. (2021). Exploring code-switching in Indonesian social media: Patterns and motivations. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 112–122.
Georgakopoulou, A. (2017). Small stories research: A narrative paradigm for the analysis of social media. In L. Sloan & A. Quan-Haase (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media research methods (pp. 266–281). SAGE.
Herring, S. C. (2013). Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, reconfigured, and emergent. In D. Tannen & A. M. Trester (Eds.), Discourse 2.0: Language and new media (pp. 1–25). Georgetown University Press.
Hu, X., & Wang, Y. (2023). Multimodal discourse and sensory communication in food vlogging: A social semiotic perspective. Discourse, Context & Media, 52, 100679.
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Manik, P. F., Daulay, S. H., & Siregar, D. Y. (2024). Fostering Student’S Speaking Ability By Using Tiktok Application. Yavana Bhasha: Journal of English Language Education, 7(1), 41-46.
Myers-Scotton, C. (1993). Social motivations for codeswitching: Evidence from Africa. Clarendon Press.
Rahman, M. A., Aziz, N., & Hassan, H. (2023). Language aesthetics and food identity in TikTok food content: A discourse analysis. Asian Journal of Communication, 33(4), 289–306.
Santoso, B., Wulandari, S., & Pratama, D. (2022). Elements, functions, and linguistic forms of the discourse structure in Indonesian food vlogs. LITERA, 21(3), 445–461.
Sani, A. (2023). Language variations in Arabic food vlogger on the S7S YouTube channel: A sociolinguistic study. Arabiyat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab dan Kebahasaaraban, 10(1), 88–104.
Statista. (2024). TikTok: Number of global monthly active users 2024. Statista Research Department.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
Trudgill, P. (2000). Sociolinguistics: An introduction to language and society (4th ed.). Penguin Books.
Yulianti, D., Sofyan, A., & Mulyadi, M. (2022). Code-switching patterns in Indonesian digital media: A sociolinguistic analysis of food content creators. Linguistik Indonesia, 40(2), 183–198.
Zeng, J., Schäfer, M. S., & Allgaier, J. (2021). Reposting TikTok as a social media practice: The role of language in viral content diffusion. Social Media + Society, 7(3).
Zhao, S., & Zappavigna, M. (2023). Social media discourse and digital identity: Food, language, and self-presentation on TikTok. Language in Society, 52(1), 45–69.
Published
2026-07-21
How to Cite
Mutia Putri, & Sholihatul Hamidah Daulay. (2026). Language Variation Used by Food Vloggers on TikTok and Its Influence on Audience Language Use. Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 12(03), 301 - 312. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v12i03.16184

Most read articles by the same author(s)