HUBUNGAN KEMAMPUAN LITERASI SEJARAH DAN RASIONALITAS KOMUNIKATIF SISWA DALAM MERESPON ISU-ISU SEJARAH KONTEMPORER DI SMK ADHIKAWACANA SURABAYA KELAS XI

  • Fika Anggreini Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Agus Suprijono Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Keywords: Keywords: Historical Literacy, Communicative Rationality, Contemporary Historical Issues, History Learning.

Abstract

This study aims to examine the relationship between historical literacy skills and students' communicative rationality in responding to contemporary historical issues at SMK Adhikawacana Surabaya. This study used a quantitative approach with a correlational research method. The study respondents included 34 grade XI Office Management 1 students selected using a purposive sampling technique. Data collection was conducted using a descriptive test based on the Solo Taxonomy to measure students' historical literacy and communicative rationality. The research instrument underwent validity and reliability testing before use. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics, prerequisite analysis tests, Pearson Product Moment correlation, and simple linear regression. The results showed a positive and significant relationship between historical literacy and students' communicative rationality. The findings indicate that the higher the students' historical literacy and communicative rationality, the better their ability to understand, analyze, and respond to contemporary historical issues critically and argumentatively. The conclusion of this study is that strengthening historical literacy and developing communicative rationality in history learning plays a crucial role in shaping students' ability to respond to various contemporary historical issues reflectively, rationally, and responsibly.

References

Aderoben, A., Darmawan, W., & Saripudin, D. (2024). Peran empati dalam pengajaran sejarah: Tinjauan literatur. Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(1), 132–151.
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Volume 1. Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Hanum, A., & Meilinda, A. (2019). Studi karakterisasi bersahabat/komunikatif pada siswa SMPN 18 Kota Jambi. Jurnal Publikasi Pendidikan, 9(2), 147–151.
Hulawa, D. E. (2021). Literasi abad 21 dalam perspektif Islam dan implikasinya terhadap pembentukan kompetensi dan kualitas karakter peserta didik (Doctoral dissertation). Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia.
Moustaghfir, S., & Brigui, H. (2024). Navigating critical thinking in the digital era: An informative exploration. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 299, 137–143.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
Pitaloka, D. (2025). Analisis pencapaian level kemampuan berpikir sejarah (historical thinking skills) materi sejarah Indonesia masa Proklamasi Kemerdekaan pada siswa kelas XI SMAN 1 Balongpanggang Gresik. Avatara: Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah, 16(4).
Subkhan, E., & Widhanarto, G. P. (2017). 21st century competencies and its implications on educational practices. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference for Science Educators and Teachers (ICSET 2017) (pp. 606–610). Paris, France: Atlantis Press.
Sugiyono. (2023). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung, Indonesia: Alfabeta.
Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Zulkarnain, I., Konfusius, D., Etika, D., & Lintas, K. (2025). Dialog moral universal: Harmonisasi pemikiran Habermas, Al-Farabi, dan Konfusius dalam etika komunikasi lintas budaya. 7(2), 395–417.
Published
2026-07-23
How to Cite
Anggreini, F., & Suprijono, A. (2026). HUBUNGAN KEMAMPUAN LITERASI SEJARAH DAN RASIONALITAS KOMUNIKATIF SISWA DALAM MERESPON ISU-ISU SEJARAH KONTEMPORER DI SMK ADHIKAWACANA SURABAYA KELAS XI. Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 12(03), 230 - 241. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v12i03.17607