PENGARUH PENGAJARAN DIALOGIS DAN PENALARAN TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN AKUNTANSI UNS

Dzikra Lulu Azzahra; Elvia Ivada

doi:10.36989/didaktik.v12i03.18638

Dzikra Lulu Azzahra Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta
Elvia Ivada Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v12i03.18638

Keywords: Accounting Education, Critical Thinking, Dialogic Teaching, Formal Reasoning.

Abstract

This quantitative research analyzes the e fects of dialogic teaching and reasoning on the critical thinking ski ls of Accounting Education students from the 2023 and 2024 cohorts. Utilizing a Stratified Random Sampling technique, a sample of 117 respondents was obtained. Data were colected via questionnaires and analyzed using multiple linear regression with SPSS. Partial testing indicates that both dialogic teaching and reasoning have positive and significant e fects on critical thinking. Simultaneously, both variables contribute 61.2% to explaining the variation in students' critical thinking capacity. However, descriptive analysis reveals an evaluative note: students' limitations in coordinating ideas and variable reasoning directly imply lower precision in drawing accounting conclusions. Therefore, accounting instruction should not merely focus on the courage to argue, but rather on strengthening the capacity for synthesis and precise scientific reasoning. The limitation of this study lies in the potential for subjectivity bias due to the reliance on self-report instruments.

References

Ennis, R. H. (1993). Critical thinking assessment. Theory Into Practice, 32(3), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849309543594

Ennis, R. H. (2011). The Nature of Critical Thinking : An Outline of Critical Thinking Dispositions.1–8

Lawson, A. E. (1978). The development and validation of a classroom test of formal reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 15(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660150103.

Liu, W., Ma, H., Ma, S., Chen, Y., & Li, G. (2026). The development and validation of a critical thinking disposition scale for high school students. Acta Psychologica, 262(October 2025), 106055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.106055.

Perry, W. G. (1998). William Perry’s Intellectual/Ethical Devel. Scheme. Perry: Intellectual/Ethical Devel., November.

Teo, P. (2021). Corrigendum to “Teaching for the 21st century: A case for dialogic pedagogy” [Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 20 (June 2019) 170–178] (Learning, Culture and Social Interaction (2019) 21 (170–178), (S2210656119300030), (10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.03.009). Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 30(xxxx), 100412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100412.

Wells, P., Gerbic, P., Kranenburg, I., & Bygrave, J. (2014). Professional skills development: Some challenges and opportunities for accounting education. Accounting Education, 23(1), 69–86.https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2013.847320.