EVALUASI SISTEM MANAJEMEN KINERJA GURU UNTUK PENINGKATAN MUTU PEMBELAJARAN DI SD BATUTIS AL-ILMI DENGAN PENDEKATAN CIPP

  • Rahmawati Dewi Agustina Universitas Panca Sakti Bekasi
  • Ifah Masrifah Universitas Panca Sakti Bekasi
  • Ronal Aspendi Universitas Panca Sakti Bekasi
Keywords: teacher performance management, learning quality, CIPP, evaluation, center-based learning

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the teacher performance management system at SD Batutis Al-Ilmi in improving the quality of center-based learning through the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) evaluation approach. This research employed a qualitative method involving observations, in-depth interviews, and documentation studies with school principals, teachers, and related parties involved in the implementation of teacher performance management. Data were analyzed interactively through data condensation, data presentation, and conclusion drawing, while data validity was ensured through source and technique triangulation. The results indicate that the teacher performance management system at SD Batutis Al-Ilmi has been implemented as a strategic effort to maintain and improve learning quality. In the context aspect, the system was developed based on the school’s needs and the characteristics of center-based learning. The input aspect showed that teacher competence, professional development programs, evaluation instruments, and supporting facilities contributed to the implementation of the system. The process aspect revealed that performance planning, supervision, evaluation, feedback, and follow-up activities were carried out to support continuous teacher development. Meanwhile, the product aspect demonstrated that the system contributed to improving teacher professionalism, strengthening teaching practices, and supporting the quality of center-based learning. Therefore, an effective and sustainable teacher performance management system can serve as an important strategy in enhancing teacher competence and improving learning quality at SD Batutis Al-Ilmi.

References

Buku :

Aguinis, H. (2023). Performance management (5th ed.). Chicago, IL: SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP evaluation model: How to evaluate for improvement and accountability. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Jurnal :

Aguinis, H. (2023). Performance Management (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Arikunto, S., & Jabar, C. S. A. (2018). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan: Pedoman Teoretis Praktis bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Armstrong, M. (2021). Armstrong’s Handbook of Performance Management: An Evidence-Based Guide to Delivering High Performance (7th ed.). Kogan Page.

Assya'banii, M., Huda, M., & Hermina, D. (2025). Evaluasi kinerja guru menggunakan model CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product). Al-Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan, 19(4).

Bowen, G. A. (2021). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2020). Accountability in teacher education. Action in Teacher Education, 42(1), 1–12.

Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Moleong, L. J. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyasa, E. (2021). Menjadi Guru Profesional: Menciptakan Pembelajaran Kreatif dan Menyenangkan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

OECD. (2020). TALIS 2018 Results: Teachers and School Leaders as Lifelong Learners. OECD Publishing.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP Evaluation Model: How to Evaluate for Improvement and Accountability. New York: The Guilford Press.

Suri, & Hariyati. (2024). Model Evaluasi CIPP dalam Evaluasi Program Pendidikan.

Utami, Isfarudi, & Sapriati. (2025). Evaluasi program pengembangan profesionalisme guru melalui kelompok kerja guru dengan model CIPP.

Published
2026-09-14
How to Cite
Dewi Agustina, R., Ifah Masrifah, & Ronal Aspendi. (2026). EVALUASI SISTEM MANAJEMEN KINERJA GURU UNTUK PENINGKATAN MUTU PEMBELAJARAN DI SD BATUTIS AL-ILMI DENGAN PENDEKATAN CIPP. Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 12(03), 399 - 408. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v12i03.18821