PENGARUH PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERTIF TIPE STAD TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN PEMAHAMAN DAN KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIS SISWA SEKOLAH DASAR
Abstract
Examined the differences in mathematical ability of understanding and communication between students and Cooperative Learning STAD and students in hands-on learning. The subjects were students of class IV SDN Sarimulya II Cikampek. The study concluded: 1) The ability of the final mathematical understanding of students who received different STAD cooperative learning with the ability of students who received direct instruction. 2) The ability of mathematical communications students getting the same STAD cooperative learning with students getting hands-on learning. 3) Increased understanding of the mathematical ability of students who received STAD cooperative learning does not differ greatly from the ability of the students who received direct instruction. 4) Improving students' mathematical communication skills that got STAD cooperative learning significantly better than students who received direct instruction.
References
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2006. Kurikulum 2006 KTSP. Jakarta: Pusat Kurikulum, Balitbang. Depdikbud.
Cai, J., Lane, S., dan Jakabcsin, M.S. (1996). The Role of Open-Ended Tasks and Holistic Scoring Rubrics: Assessing Student’s Mathematical Reasoning and Communication. Dalam P.C Elliot dan M.J Kenney (Eds). Yearbook Communication in Mathematics K-12 and Beyond. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Jolliffe, W. (2007). Cooperative in The Classroom: Putting it into Practice. London: PCP (Paul Chapman Publishing)
Kramarski. (2000). “The Effect od Different Instructional Methods on The Ability to Communicate MathematicalReasoning”. Dalam Nahakama, T dan Koyama, M. Proceeding of The 24th Conference of The International Group for The Psychology of Mathematics Education. Hiroshima University
Lim, L., Pugalee, D. (2004). Using Journal Writing to Explore “They Communicate to Learn Mathematics and They Learn to Communicate Mathematically”. [Online]. Tersedia: www.nipissingu.ca/oar/pdfs/v722.pdf
Napitululu, E.L. (2012). Prestasi Sains dan Matematika Indonesia Menurun. [Online]. Tersedia: http://edukasi.kompas.com/read/2012/12/14/09005434
Slavin. (2005). Cooperative Learning: Teori Riset dan Praktik. Bandung: Nusa Media
Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Sumarmo, U. (2004). Pembelajaran Matematika untuk Mendukung Pelaksanaan Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi. Makalah pada Pertemuan MGMP Matematika SMPN I Tasikmalaya.[12 Februari 2005].
Suryadi, D. (2010). Menciptakan Proses Belajar Aktif: Kajian dari Sudut Pandang Teori Belajar dan Teori Didaktik. Makalah pada Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika di UNP
Van de Walle, J., (2006). Sekolah Dasar dan Menengah: Matematika Pengembangan dan Pengajaran Jilid I. Jakarta: Erlangga
Wahyudin. (2012). Filsafat dan Model-model Pembelajaran Matematika. Bandung: Mandiri
