ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN KOGNITIF MATEMATIS PESERTA DIDIK DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR VAK (VISUAL, AUDITORY, KINESTETIK)
Abstract
This research is a descriptive qualitative research which aims to analyze cognitive abilities based on Bloom's Taxonomy which has visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles in class VIII A of SMP N 2 Pati. There are 6 cognitive domains, namely remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating and creating. The subjects of this research were class 8A students consisting of 32 students and 3 students were taken, namely 1 student with a visual learning style, 1 student with an auditory learning style and 1 student with a kinesthetic learning style. This assessment data collection technique uses questionnaires, written tests and interviews. The sampling technique used is purposive sampling. The triangulation used is technical triangulation. The research results show that (1) Students with a visual learning style are able to remember, understand, apply, analyze, evaluate and create well. Students can solve questions according to the right steps and formulas so that they get good results. (2) Students with an auditory learning style are able to remember, understand, apply, analyze and create well. But students have difficulty evaluating questions. (3) Students with a kinesthetic learning style are able to remember, understand, apply and create well but have difficulty evaluating and analyzing the answers given. Therefore, it can be concluded that subjects with a visual learning style are able to fulfill all indicators of cognitive ability. subjects with an auditory learning style were able to fulfill all indicators of cognitive ability except the evaluating indicator. Subjects with a kinesthetic learning style are able to fulfill all indicators of cognitive ability except those of analyzing and evaluating.
References
Tohir, M. (2019). Hasil PISA Indonesia Tahun 2018 Turun Dibanding Tahun 2015. Paper of Matematohir, 2(1), 1–2. https://matematohir.wordpress.com/2019/12/03/hasil-pisa-indonesia-tahun-2018-turun-dibanding-tahun-2015/
Kemendikbud. (2019). Hasil PISA Indonesia 2018: Akses Makin Meluas, Saatnya Tingkatkan Kualitas. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2019/12/hasil-pisa-indonesia-2018-akses-makin-meluas-saatnya-tingkatkan-kualitas#:~:text=Hasil studi PISA 2018 yang,rata skor OECD yakni 487.
Kemendikbud. (2016). Peringkat dan Capaian PISA Indonesia Mengalami Peningkatan. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2016/12/peringkat-dan-capaian-pisa-indonesia-mengalami-peningkatan
Nurhidayah, D. A. (2015). Pengaruh motivasi berprestasi dan gaya belajar terhadap prestasi belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran matematika smp. Jurnal Dimensi Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 3(2), 13–24.
PISA Result. (2015). PISA Result in Focus 2015. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf
Aida, N., Kusaeri, K., & Hamdani, S. (2017). Karakteristik Instrumen Penilaian Hasil Belajar Matematika Ranah Kognitif yang Dikembangkan Mengacu pada Model PISA. Suska Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(2), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.24014/sjme.v3i2.3897
Amaliyah, R. I. (2019). Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Aqidah Akhlak Siswa MTS Darul Falah Bendiljati Kulon Sumbergempol Tulungagung. Jurnal Repository UIN Satu Tulungagung, 1(1). www.journal.uta45jakarta.ac.id
Saefiana;, Sukmawati, F. D., Rahmawati;, Rusnady, D. A. M., Sukatin;, & Syaifuddin. (2022). Teori Pembelajaran dan Perbedaan Gaya Belajar. Mahaguru: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 3(1), 150–158. https://doi.org/10.33487/mgr.v3i1.3976
Ritonga, N. C., & Rahma, I. F. (2021). Analisis gaya belajar VAK pada pembelajaran daring terhadap minat belajar siswa. Jurnal Analisa, 7(1), 76–86.
Nabilah;, Stepanus;, & Hamdani. (2020). Analisis kemampuan kognitif peserta didik dalam menyelesaikan soal momentum dan impuls. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika, 1(1), 1–7.
Anderson;, & Krathwohl. (2022). Revisi Taksonomi Bloom. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Abu Ahmad, H., & Supriyono, W. (2013). Psikologi Belajar (3rd ed.). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Supit, D., Melianti;, Lasut, E. M. M., & Tumbel, N. J. (2023). Gaya Belajar Visual, Auditori, Kinestetik terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Journal on Education, 5(3), 6994–7003. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i3.1487
Suliantiani, N. M., Sridana, N., Triutami, T. W., & Soepriyanto, H. (2023). Analisis Kecemasan dan Disposisi Matematis Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas XI di SMA Negeri 2 Gerung Tahun Pelajaran 2022/2023. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 8. http://jipp.unram.ac.id/index.php/jipp/article/view/1524/909
Ishartono, N., Faiziyah, N., Sutarni, S., Putri, A. B., Fatmasari, L. W. S., Sayuti, M., Rahmaniati, R., & Yunus, M. M. (2021). Visual , Auditory , and Kinesthetic Students : How They Solve PISA-Oriented Mathematics Problems ? Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1720/1/012012
Wibowo, T., Riawan, Y. P., & Wiwit, H. (2018). Analisis Tingkat Kognitif Siswa SMP Dengan Kemampuan Rendah Berdasarkan Taksonomi Revisi Bloom Pada Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. PROSIDING SENDIKA, 4(1).
Nithiya, D. R., Palve, S., Palve, S. B., & Tipandjan, A. (2021). Use of Kinaesthetic Learning Skills among Slow Learners in Physiology to Improve Their Academic Performance. Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International, 33, 8–17. https://doi.org/10.9734/jpri/2021/v33i34b31842
