PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PBL BERBANTUAN CHAT GPT TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR KOGNITIF SISWA DALAM PEMBELAJARAN IPAS SISWA SEKOLAH DASAR

  • Fenta Mayasari Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Edi Kurniawan Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Muh Sholeh Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Indriana Eko Amaidi Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Amin Yusuf Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Sungkowo Edy Mulyono Universitas Negeri Semarang
Keywords: Problem Based Learning, ChatGPT, elementary school

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of the Problem Based Learning (PBL) model assisted by ChatGPT on students’ cognitive learning outcomes in IPAS learning at SD Negeri 184/III Pauh Tinggi. This research employed a quantitative approach using a quasi-experimental method with a nonequivalent control group design. The population consisted of 146 students, with class V A as the control group (16 students) and class V B as the experimental group (19 students), selected using purposive sampling technique. The research instrument was a cognitive learning outcome test that had been validated and tested for reliability. Data analysis was conducted through normality and homogeneity tests, followed by hypothesis testing using an independent sample t-test. The results showed a significant difference in cognitive learning outcomes between the experimental and control groups, with a significance value of less than 0.05. The average posttest score of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group. Therefore, it can be concluded that the Problem Based Learning model assisted by ChatGPT has a significant effect on improving students’ cognitive learning outcomes. This model is effective in creating active, interactive, and meaningful learning.

References

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Ayanwale, M. A., Sanusi, I. T., & Adesina, O. S. (2026). Artificial intelligence-supported problem-based learning: Impacts on students’ engagement and self-regulated learning. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100152

Bano, S., Zowghi, D., Kearney, M., Schuck, S., & Aubusson, P. (2024). Mobile learning for science and mathematics education: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Computers & Education, 189, 104611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104611

Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., & Cheng, G. (2024). ChatGPT for education: A systematic review and future research directions. Educational Technology & Society, 27(1), 1–15.

Choi-Lundberg, D. (2023). ChatGPT and the future of education: Opportunities and challenges. Medical Education, 57(6), 581–583. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14998

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2021). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of artificial intelligence in education. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.002

Huang, R., Spector, J. M., & Yang, J. (2023). Educational technology transformation in the 21st century. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(2), 1–15.

Huda, M. (2017). Model-model pengajaran dan pembelajaran. Pustaka Pelajar.

Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., & Suman, R. (2023). ChatGPT applications in education: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology, 20(2), 45–60.

Lee, G. G., & Zhai, X. (2024). ChatGPT for science learning: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 33(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10000-0

Lim, J., Wang, T., & Graham, C. R. (2023). Driving and sustaining blended learning in education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(1), 1–25.

Loyens, S. M. M., Magda, J., & Rikers, R. M. J. P. (2022). Self-directed learning in problem-based learning and its relationships with self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 34(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-0

Purba, R., Sinaga, B., & Manullang, M. (2021). Analysis of validity and reliability in educational research. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 5(2), 67–75.

Rosiyanti, H., Waluya, S. B., & Rochmad. (2021). Instrument validation in educational research. Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 12–20.

Savery, J. R. (2021). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 15(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.14434/ijpbl.v15i1.31847

Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2021). Promoting self-regulated learning in science education. Research in Science Education, 51(2), 1–15.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Yew, E. H. J., & Schmidt, H. G. (2021). Evidence for constructive, self-regulated, and collaborative processes in problem-based learning. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 26(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-020-09982-3

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.

Published
2026-08-01
How to Cite
Fenta Mayasari, Edi Kurniawan, Muh Sholeh, Indriana Eko Amaidi, Amin Yusuf, & Sungkowo Edy Mulyono. (2026). PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PBL BERBANTUAN CHAT GPT TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR KOGNITIF SISWA DALAM PEMBELAJARAN IPAS SISWA SEKOLAH DASAR. Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 12(02), 173 - 184. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v12i02.18223